TEHRAN - In a note, Kayhan attended to the new round of negotiations with the West and the reformists reception of the talks.It wrote: Reformist media believe that the U.S.
President is most likely attempting to prevent taking a harsh position versus Iran so that the course to discussion to deal with the nuclear issue will not be blocked.
It seems that in the coming weeks and months, the main U.S.
position toward Iran will end up being clearer, and these positions will most likely focus on lowering stress and finding solutions to the issues.
One way to impose settlements is to use the danger and coercion method.
The U.S.
and Europe have previously utilized this technique many times to try to consist of Iran and prevent it from achieving its indisputable right in the nuclear field.
For this purpose, the European troika (Britain, France, and Germany) attempted to threaten Iran with the trigger (snapback) mechanism some time ago.
This is while those who pretending assistance for reforms ignore this problem and are seeking to trade Irans power by repeatedly demanding negotiations.
It seems that the West is deteriorating Irans function in the region by creating an unfavorable environment against Irans nuclear program and using hegemonic methods.
This is while reformists disregard this policy and technique by insisting on settlements with the United States.
The goal of American authorities in working out with Iran is containment.Iran: Tehrans voice in DavosIn an analysis, the Iran newspaper went over the journey of Mohammad Javad Zarif, the Vice President for Strategic Affairs, to the 55th World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.
It said: The function of Zarifs journey was to describe the policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the region and the world.
His assessments with the officials present at this worldwide conference were to some level influenced by important difficulties such as the (Iran) nuclear file, however his other goal was to elaborate on among the primary mottos of the Pezeshkian government, specifically de-escalation and active and well balanced relations with the East and the West.
The awareness of this concept is not possible without vibrant diplomacy.
Zarif looked for to provide a clear photo of Irans principled goals and needs to neutralize the anti-Iran narrative and repair work relations with local powers.
He highlighted that Iran is not a danger to global security, and that some countries are trying to present a false image of the country by promoting Iranophobia.Arman-e-Melli: US return to talks not easyArman-e-Melli talked to international relations analyst Dr.
Pirouz Mojtahedzadeh to examine and examine the prospects of settlements with Trump.
He said: Trumps statements at the inauguration event have led the environment in an instructions that appears his administration is going to pursue a policy of maximum pressure against Iran once again.
To examine the existing realities, we must remedy this vision that Iran as a regional power and the United States as a global power must not be seen similarly in regards to competition.
Iran is taken part in competitions at the local level, which are not appropriate internationally.
Tehrans competition with the United States is related to Irans concerns in the area and relations with Middle East nations.
World powers should not interfere in the formation of producing balance in our area.
If Iran is pursuing its interests in this area, it must reach a level of influence that foreign actors can not contribute in the equation of this area.
Bringing the United States to the negotiating table with Iran wont be simple and other paths must be followed that have their own difficulties.Shargh: Bin Farhans claims are simply rhetoricalShargh evaluated the Saudi Foreign Ministers remarks in Davos in which he soft-pedaled the danger of an Israel-Iran war due to Trumps return to the White House.
It said: Saudi Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan just recently discussed the requirement to de-escalate tension in between Tehran and Tel Aviv.
It appears that the statements of the head of the Saudi diplomatic service can not be unrelated to the political modifications and advancements in Washington.
It should be stated that the positions of the Saudi foreign policy officials are simply diplomatic rhetoric.
Provided the current circumstance and thinking about the return of Donald Trump to the White House, there is no possibility of a direct clash in between Iran and Israel in a brief time.
Netanyahus federal government is on the edge of collapse.
To prevent the fall of his union cabinet, Netanyahu will either look for significant stress with Tehran, which is not likely to occur with the concerning power of Donald Trump, or he should wait on the fall of the cabinet and early elections.